Tuesday, 23 October 2012

Leveraged TFSA vs. Leveraged Non-Registered Portfolio


The Tax Free Savings Account (TFSA) that was introduced in 2009, is a great tool for many investors and can help them avoid paying some taxes with their investment income or gains that they normally would pay with a non-registered portfolio.  However; is the TFSA always the best vehicle to use?

When investors borrow money to invest in a non-registered portfolio, in most cases the interest on those borrowed funds is tax deductible in the year it was paid. That’s not the case however for a TFSA or other registered portfolios.  When money is borrowed to invest in a TFSA, CRA does not permit you to deduct the interest payments against your income in the current year, or any other year for that matter.  With that, below is an illustration comparing the two different investment vehicles.

For illustration purposes, we have to make a few assumptions based on rates of return, interest payments, length of investment, current marginal tax rate (MTR) and MTR’s in retirement or when the funds are actually withdrawn from the portfolios, as well as income tax consequences.  Being that $20,000 is the current maximum (2012) that can be contributed to a TFSA (provided no contributions were made in previous years), I will illustrate borrowing $20,000 to invest in a TFSA vs. borrowing $20,000 to invest in a non-registered portfolio and having the funds invested in the same Corporate Class Mutual Fund or other investment where the gains are tax deferred until withdrawn.  I will also assume that the tax refund from the non-registered portfolio is reinvested so that the comparison is fair.

Assumptions:
·       30 year investment
·       6% interest only payment on loan
·       8% return on investment
·       40% Marginal Tax Rate today (investors working years)
·       30% Marginal Tax Rate in retirement
·       Capital Gains tax treatment on non-registered portfolio

TFSA

$20,000 borrowed and invested earning 8% compound annually, the total in 30 years would be $201,253.  Minus the $20,000 loan and the total TFSA value in 30 years is $181,253.

Non Registered Portfolio

$20,000 borrowed at 6% interest will create a tax deduction of $1,200 each year against the investor’s income.  At a 40% MTR, this will create a refund of $480 (1200 x 40%) per year that we would not have with the TFSA and therefore could reinvest to keep the comparison fair.  After 30 years, the portfolio will be $255,629 if it averages 8% annually. Minus the tax payable of $33,184 {[255,629 – (30 x 480 + 20,000)] /2 x 30%} and also the loan of $20,000, the total portfolio will be approximately $202,445.


Summary

Using the assumptions that we have, it clearly shows that using a non-registered portfolio vs. a TFSA is the better choice when it comes to borrowing money to invest.  It is imperative however that you speak with your financial advisor to ensure which strategy (if either, as borrowing to invest can be risky) is right for you and to use your own assumptions when determining MTR’s, interest payments, rates of return and tax consequences.

If you would like more information on this comparison or have questions, please don’t hesitate to call me at 778-478-0727 or email at scott.turner@iagto.ca


                

4 comments:

  1. Hi Scott,

    Thanks for the great post!

    Could you clarify one thing for me? In the calculation of the taxes owing on non-registered account, you set out the following: $33,184 {[255,629 – (30 x 480 + 20,000)] /2 x 30%}

    Isn't this double counting the interest expense on the loan? You deduct the interest expense as a carrying charge in the year it is incurred. The calculation then seems to also include the interest expense in the ACB in calculating the capital gains. Am I missing something?

    Thanks for your help!
    Steve

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Steve

      Thanks for posting your question and my apologies for just reading it now.

      I believe my calculations to be correct but to be on the safe side, I am going to consult with an accountant who has a greater area of expertise in this field than me. The way I see it is that the $480 the person would receive on their tax return each year is reinvested into the portfolio and should therefore increase the ACB accordingly. But let me get back to you on that.

      Thanks, Scott

      Delete
    2. To add to my previous post Steve, the interest expense is actually $1200 in the assumption and the $480 figure is the tax refund using a 40% MTR, which is then reinvested into the portfolio. But still, let me confirm everything with an accountant.

      Thanks again, Scott

      Delete
  2. Hi Steve

    I confirmed with an accountant this morning and he feels my calculations are indeed correct but stressed the importance of analyzing every situation on a case by case basis. If you have other information to share, I would enjoy reading it.

    Thanks, Scott

    ReplyDelete